Continuing the years-long saga of whether or not net neutrality laws will be passed in the U.S., the Bush Administration has finally taken an official stance:

They’re against it. (As reported by CNN here.)

Think what you will about the current leadership of this country; this move was not at all unexpected. The Bush Presidency has made no secret that it’s all for reducing regulations on private enterprise, at any cost; in fact, that’s been its main platform from day one. And it’s arguably a praiseworthy, maybe even a necessary, political position to hold in a country that thrives on capitalism.

However, looking at the issue as purely black or white just doesn’t work with net neutrality. As we’ve stated before, this is an issue where regulation isn’t a bad thing; it’s an exception to the rule, where regulation ultimately helps people, and even helps the very democracy that, as a partner to capitalism, makes this nation great.

Furthermore, it’s highly unusual for a federal law enforcement department to take part in a political debate that pertains in no way to law enforcement. What do you think? Is the Justice Department out of line here? Or do you agree with this position? Leave a comment and let us know what you think.